Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
1. How to control PLEX price (ISK) to CCP - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Back when plex were in the 350-500m range I used to sub 4 accounts and usually gave away a plex to some random nooblet every few months. During this time I could reasonably expect an income around 7~ish billion a month give or take based on drops ...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.28 23:47:49
|
2. Number of players dropped to less than half in Hek - in Market Discussions [original thread]
Jita and Amarr have the same issue, I do believe part is a decentralization of trade, but part is a serious drop in daily logins.
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.28 22:35:47
|
3. New loki stats on test server, mostly good, but something very bad. - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
TigerXtrm wrote: Kisar wrote: Unless you want to have only 3 mid slots on your Loki, you need to fit the Wake Limiter propulsion upgrade. The trouble is it comes with garbage stats. 10% afterburner increase per level, 10% reduction in mwd si...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.28 22:24:15
|
4. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Rek Seven wrote: Noxisia Arkana wrote: Rek Seven wrote: @Focus group, am I reading right that Fozzie has moved the warp speed bonus to the nullification subsystem? Why was it removed from the non-nullified sub...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.28 21:53:17
|
5. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Tyrant's Bane wrote: Well, After 4 years I have decided to come back and one of the first things I notice is the discussion on upcoming changes to T3 cruisers. I really like the proposed changes and am looking forward to them. Any idea on when ...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.28 03:55:43
|
6. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Secretariot Eto wrote: T3Cs are receiving a long awaited nerf. I think we all need to get over that fact and realize they won't have the best damage/tank/ewar/agility combined anymore. Btw, they still deal a ridiculous amount of damage for c...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.27 00:39:58
|
7. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: Mhari Dson wrote: BESTER bm wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: Does it really matter if you are a solo or group player, PVE or PVP, as long as you play It should not, but recent developments would indicate that CCP d...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.26 16:43:10
|
8. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
BESTER bm wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: Does it really matter if you are a solo or group player, PVE or PVP, as long as you play It should not, but recent developments would indicate that CCP does at least try to promote a specific style o...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.26 09:01:38
|
9. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Blazemonger wrote: If it was up to me: 1. Offensive Weapons ECM / ewar Covert OPS 2. Defensive Tank ECCM Remote rep 3. Core Probe and Hack PG/CPU [have to think of this one] 4. Propulsion Nullification Speed subwarp and agility Warpspeed ...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.25 22:06:52
|
10. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
WhiteOrm wrote: I know that you probably have given it a deep thought, but Loki with 5-2 high slots is not going to go far =/ Every time you do something like that we have another underpowered ship with spare non bonused slots fitted with energ...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.25 02:32:34
|
11. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Aside from the logistics/link improvements, I think this has to be the worst piece of development work I've had to look at since I began playing. Was hoping to get back to using these after a multi-year wait but they'll stay in the mothball dock, ...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.24 02:26:55
|
12. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
FYI SISI is up with the stats loaded in, the launcher can't seem to tell if it's there. Attempting login does work. And Thanks CCP Fozzie for getting that up for us, hope it didn't cut into your weekend too much.
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.22 03:27:08
|
13. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
BESTER bm wrote: Mhari Dson wrote: When it comes down to it this is what I expect of a good exploration ship: 1-2 utility highs (probes, salvager optional) 3 utility mids (relic/data/cargo scanner) 400-450 applied dps (HAM/HML apply so poorl...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.22 01:26:34
|
14. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
When it comes down to it this is what I expect of a good exploration ship: 1-2 utility highs (probes, salvager optional) 3 utility mids (relic/data/cargo scanner) 400-450 applied dps (HAM/HML apply so poorly the sheet dps for this is over 700) 50...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.21 23:58:59
|
15. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Dior Ambraelle wrote: BESTER bm wrote: Jeremiah Saken wrote: I guess superior sites scaled to be done in BS hull. Guess what, nobody will do exploration in BS hull because they are non mobile after warp changes, and mobility is the number...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.21 23:03:02
|
16. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Mhari Dson wrote: If you have to keep repeating yourself then one side or the other is wrong, since you're having everyone else in the thread come against you perhaps you should take a different look at your line of discuss...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.21 21:01:58
|
17. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: Dior Ambraelle wrote: It's not fun to argue with you if all you're doing is keep repeating the same thing over and over again, while ignoring all options and possibilities that would change these ships. I have to keep on r...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.21 20:24:21
|
18. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
baltec1 wrote: BESTER bm wrote: Eustise wrote: An explo update on the new numbers. Here's a sheet i've been working with: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KHX0UbkcCTQRtfmL1xIQ8TC8UytrS6N5Tm-jpCJsUDI/edit?usp=sharing In short, w...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.20 16:29:38
|
19. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
BESTER bm wrote: Eustise wrote: An explo update on the new numbers. Here's a sheet i've been working with: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1KHX0UbkcCTQRtfmL1xIQ8TC8UytrS6N5Tm-jpCJsUDI/edit?usp=sharing In short, we will enjoy bigge...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.20 02:12:44
|
20. Sticky:Strategic Cruiser Focus Group Working Thread - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Having the drone bay (not bandwidth) as part of the hull makes sense in that if you swap offensive subs to a non drone carrier, you suddenly have to stash a huge amount of drones in cargo. 9 highslot proteus might be entertaining til it crashes y...
- by Mhari Dson - at 2017.06.18 04:58:13
|
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |